Contingency Approach to Management
The contingency approach believes that it is impossible to select one way of managing that works best in all situations like promoted by Taylor.
The contingency approach believes that it is impossible to select one way of managing that works best in all situations like promoted by Taylor. Their approach is to identify the conditions of a task (scientific management school), managerial job (administrative management school) and person (human relations school) as parts of a complete management situation and attempt to integrate them all into a solution which is most appropriate for a specific circumstance. Contingency refers to the immediate (contingent or touching) circumstances.
The manager has to systematically try to identify which technique or approach will be the best solution for a problem which exists in a particular circumstance or context.
An example of this is the never ending problem of increasing productivity. The different experts would offer the following solutions:
- Behavioral scientist: create a climate which is psychologically motivating;
- Classical management approach: create a new incentive scheme;
- Contingency approach: both ideas are viable and it depends on the possible fit of each solution with the goals, structure and resources of the organization. .
The contingency approach may consider, for policy reasons, that an incentive scheme was not relevant. The complexity of each situation should be noted and decisions made in each individual circumstance.
It should be realized that the contingency approach is not really new because Taylor already emphasized the importance of choosing the general type of management best suited to a particular case. Henri Fayol, in turn, also found that there is nothing rigid or absolute in management affairs.
Similar ideas were expressed in the 1920s, by Mary Parker Follett (1865-1933) who was greatly interested in social work and was a genius for relating individual experience to general principles. Her concept of the law of the situation referred to the necessity of acting in accordance with the specific requirements of a given situation. She noted that these requirements were constantly changing and needed continuous efforts to maintain effective working relationships.
The contingency approach seeks to apply to real life situations ideas drawn from various schools of management thought. They claim that no one approach is universally applicable and different problems and situations require different approaches. Managers must try to find the approach that is the best for them in a certain given situation, so they can achieve their goals.
It is important to note that the contingency approach stresses the need for managers to examine the relationship between the internal and external environment of an organization. Critics of the contingency approach have blamed it to lack theoretical foundation and are basically intuitive. Managers today are advised to analyze a situation and use ideas from the various schools of thought to find an appropriate combination of management techniques to meet the needs of the situation.

22 Comments
i need more information on contingency school of approach.
please differenciate between contency approach and system approach to management and which among the two is the best.
i need to know the contingency characteristics and the lessons and real life applications of the contingency approach
very interesting
i agree with beccas comment …she makes a valid point. sehr interessant !
i want to know the importance of contigency approach
This page on the contingency approach to management is very informing but lacks real life applications.
I strongly believe I contigency approach application in real life situation. In my years of management it has alwayz worked. What I amazing is, you can also tream it down and us it not only to organisational situation but also to each and every employee on individual ebbcounter or apply it on your expiriences in life. Eg financial problems. Just because your brother had to win lotto to pay all his debts doesn’t necessary the same idea will work for you.
it is very brief can someone expand on it
Which one is more important contingence or system approaches
I NEED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE APPROACH IN REAL LIFE SIYUATIONS
i need more information on management theory;the classical management theories,the behavioural or human relation school,the quantitative or management science school, the system approach,the contigency approach.
this is very brief explaination…
i want the difference between system approach and ontingency approach
HI I ‘M ROBERT IN UGANDA I WAS VERY DELIGHTFUL TO HAVE COME ACROSS YOUR SCHOLARLY WORK ON THE NET. I THEREFORE FEEL DEEPLY INDEBTED THAT IT RESCUED ME AT A VERY CRITICAL MOMENT OF EXAMINATION. INDEED NO BETTER EXPRESSION OF ANY ENGLISH PHRASE CAN SATISFY ME IN APPRECIATION TO THAT REGARD. AND MAY THE ALMIGHTY GOD KINDLY REWARD YOU ON MY BEHALF.
Despite of your ever commendable job towards the success of many in the academic arena, I’d request you further to guide me on HOW THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT DETERMINE PEOPLES BEHAVIOURS IN AN ORGANIZATION.
fuck you go fuck your mom asshole.
pls sent it to my mail
Hi all, in this life all you need is freedom. If you want financial freedom, time for your family, a robust health, great and free car and a reputable business to build contact Brunogogi2004ke@yahoo.com. Cheers
this is very helpful. thanks
Iam persuaded to think that as it is, with all human beings, employees blossom in stable environments that provide some certain amount of structure and consistency from management.The contigency approach advocates a ‘No cut out approach’ that is completely dependent on external stimuli. If not managed properly, this style of management can become physically and mentally demanding for the employees,and we all know how this plays out in relation to the bottom line!
i need information with example.