Losing Business At Entry
How one minimum wage employee can bankrupt a company.
I entered the lobby. It was nine fifty five. I had a ten o’clock with the Chief Executive Officer. I approached the receptionist. She was answering telephone calls; “XYZ Incorporated, how many I help you?” The phone kept ringing, she continued to answer every call. She seemed unable to see me standing in front of her.
I took out my cell phone, began capturing her on video for the next twenty seconds, then, stepping away, rang my secretary. She in turn would call the C.E.O. and tell him: “Sir, the Consultant is in the Lobby but unable to see you as the receptionist refuses to acknowledge. Could you be good enough to go down to the Lobby?”
It is a typical problem; so typical, that when I rang my secretary I simply said; “Keisha”, my name for a receptionist who is fascinated by telephones. The reason why this company was losing business was that clients who phoned were given priority to those present.
I saw the C.E.O enter the lobby before he saw me. I didn’t need my video to prove the point. He stood aghast as a line milled around reception desk while she kept answering the phone. He watched people leave in disgust. But it’s perfectly understandable.
You are a Japanese businessman who has flown in to discuss a multi-million dollar deal, you are ignored in the lobby for one minute, you walk out.
No one will do business with a company which ignores them. The entry point to your business must be welcoming, at least acknowledging. The client who is present must always take priority over those on the telephone. It is such a common mistake a consultant can virtually collect his or her fee going no farther than the lobby.
My task was very simple.
All I did was request copies of the appointment books from all departments going back two months, notated with how many had not been kept. It seemed evident the large number of “no shows” had actually shown, but reached no farther than the lobby. The C.E.O. was incredulous. He never imagined performing an audit on how many appointments were not kept.
This company lost millions of dollars because of a minimum wage employee. ‘Voice mail’ or “Automated Answering” is not the solution. Many potential customers or clients are not going to listen to a long “If you want to speak to our technical department press one, if you wish to speak to our…”
Either they push “0″ (to speak to a human) or hang up. Those who go through the rigmarole, might, at the end of the recording, appreciate that their request can not be answered, press “0″, while others might make errors and have to start again. Why bother?
Imagine an overseas client searching for a local representative. Surely he would not want his business handled by “voice mail”. It is wiser to have a call answered by a human who can differentiate between callers. Some calls can be routed to automated systems, but some must be immediately sent to senior personnel. It is not wise to “cut down” on costs by having the receptionist be the telephone operator unless she is capable of appreciating that the person in front of her takes priority over the one on the telephone.
Minimum wage is not so onerous that one can not afford that extra operator. In most cases, Voice Mail gives the impression the company is not economically viable, (it can’t afford a minimum wage operator). However, the problem is not the client on the line, it is the client in the room. The one being ignored.
It doesn’t take five minutes to advise all employees that the person standing in front of them takes priority over the telephone call. Of course, if this were done, I might be out of a job.

7 Comments
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve watched people
answer the phone, ignoring me.
Why would you blatantly use a name such as Keisha? That is a complete slap in the face to African Americans, who , by the way, wouldn’t qualify for such a high profile job!!! This article is racist!!
America is not the world. Keisha is not an uncommon name in the
part of the world where I come from.
You are an idiot…as most consultants are…it was probably you or some other other over paid clown who told xyz that they only needed one person on reception and that all telephone calls should be answered within 3 rings.
The company didn’t loose business because of a minimum wage employee…..she/he isn’t paid to think…they lost business because of gormless overpaid people like you.
What I find so remarkable is your mindless anger, Michael.
My anger is well justified. I have seen a successful business raped by consultants
Michael, why wasn’t this your first post? We are on
the same page. I’m posting a lot of advice a
CEO or owner or Manager can do for himself.
I have also seen consultants who have absolutely
no clue giving the worst possible advice, and
certainly have, in your words…
—seen a successful business
raped by consultants—
One company had it happen when their ‘legacy’
system was replaced by idiots who didn’t
realise that twenty years worth of work would
be lost and that the 120 Bit encryption would
be replaced by the wonderful Windows 2000.
(Here’s a barf bag).
I walked in on another just before it tanked
to learn that a new hierarchial ’system’ had
been put in place which was so cumbersome
it ended productivity.
My view is that you get a consultant when you
can’t figure out what is wrong, and then do
the checks.
This is why I called the CEO to the Lobby so
he could see for himself that it was the
telephonic protocols which lost clients.
I never present a report in a sterile atmosphere.
I always show my client what I am seeing.
If that means taking videos on my cell,
or taping the entire process from
entry to exit, that is what it means.
I’m trying my best to demystify the entire
consultancy aspect of business.
And will, with your provocation, write exactly
what you’ve indicated, how some consultants
can rape a business. Thanks.